RAM AWADH PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/14824/2025 · 2025-12-19
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197291 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197291 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14824 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following main relief:-
"(1) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding opposite parties to make the payment of arrears of salary to petitioner in regular pay-scale attached with Class-IV post w.e.f. 19.09.2008, the date from which junior to petitioner was given regular appointment and salary in Class-IV post, by keeping the word "notional service" in abeyance ..... "
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before authority concerned. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of six weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition stands finally disposed of. December 19, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Virendra Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Ram Awadh Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Food And Civil Supplies Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench