SAYEED AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. / PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/7724/2024 · 2025-11-21
Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197290 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197290 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7724 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. has pointed out that in the instant case, the investigation has already been concluded and the charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner, as such, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner do not dispute the aforesaid fact.
3. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous with the liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum at appropriate stage.
November 21, 2025 R Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Himanshu Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Ajeet Kumar (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Sayeed Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. / Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM ASARE MORYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench