DHRUV NARAYAN YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/1407/2025 · 2025-10-07
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197280 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197280 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1407 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Shri Rahul Singh Rana, Advocate has filed vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party no.2 which is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and
learned counsel for opposite party no.2.
Learned counsel for the applicant, after arguing at length, submits that the present bail application could not have been filed under all the sections mentioned in the rejection order. He prays for withdrawal of the application with liberty to file a fresh one.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file afresh.
The office is directed to return the certified copies of the documents to the
learned counsel for the applicant. October 7, 2025 Madhu D.R/P.S Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Raghvendra P. Singh, Vijay Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Rahul Singh Rana, Shambhu Prasad (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Dhruv Narayan Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MADHU KUMARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench