Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 197270 (ALL)

JAI SINGH @ MUNNA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.

BAIL/8122/2025 · 2025-10-10

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8122 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State, Shri Rahul Agnihotri, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.396 of 2025, under Sections 85, 80(2), 115(2), 351(2), 352 BNS and Sections 3/4 D. P. Act, P.S. Gola, District Lakhimpur Kheri. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that the FIR in question was lodged stating that the daughter of the informant was married to the son of the applicant and subsequently she was killed. The post mortem report indicate the cause of death as ante mortem hanging. 4. Learned AGA and learned counsel for the informant have strongly opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the fact that the applicant who is aged about 48 years is father in law and there is no specific allegations against him, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 21.6.2025 is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Jai Singh @ Munna be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amit Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Rahul Agnihotri Jai Singh @ Munna .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 10, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 8122 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench