1 2025:CGHC:8387 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 991 of 2018 Khilawan Prasad Sharma S/o Kedar Prasad Sharma Aged About 65 Years R/o- P.S. Mohla, Mohla, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through- P.S. Mohla, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 2. Smt. Sharda Gupta W/o Laxminarayan Gupta Aged About 56 Years R/o- Village Mohla, P.S. Mohla, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 3. Dr. V.K. Goyal A-36, Power House Bhilai, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Sweksha Sharma, Advocate For Respondent/State For respondent No.2 : : Ms. Monika Thakur, Panel Lawyer Ms. Samiksha Burman, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 18.02.2025 1. Heard Ms. Sweksha Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. Monika Thakur, learned Panel Lawyer, appears for the respondent/State, and Ms. Samiksha Burman, learned counsel for the respondent No.2. RAHUL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by RAHUL DEWANGAN 2 2. This instant petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: “It is therefore prayed that in view of the submissions made hereinabove and in the light of facts and circumstances of the case this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this application/petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and grant the following relieves to the petitioner:- 1] That the entire records pertaining to the present case may kindly be called for the perusal of this Hon'ble Court. 2] That, the entire records pertaining to the medical examination of the respondent no.2. 3] That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to examine the correctness, legality and propriety of the order dated 24.01.2018. 4] That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside the order dated 24.01.2018 passed by the learned Session Judge, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.). 5] Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the interest of justice, may kindly be awarded” 3 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the trial has already been concluded against the petitioner. Therefore, the present petition has become infructuous. 4. Learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for the respondent have no objection. 5. In view of the above submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.-- Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rahul Dewangan