HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13241 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Umesh Chandra Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the opposite parties, particularly opposite party No. 2, be directed to provide the benefit of Third ACP to the petitioner as per the Government Order dated 02.12.2000 and 05.11.2014 and also revise pension of the petitioner in pursuance of the same, however, After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for suitable direction to decide representation of the petitioner, annexed as Annexure-1 to the petition. 3. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner. 4. In view of the above, opposite party No. 2, i.e., Collector/District Magistrate, Raebareli, is directed to decide representation of the petitioner (Annexure- 1 to the writ petition) within 6 months from the date a certified copy of this order alongwith copy of Annexure- 1 to the writ petition, is filed before him, and communicate the decision to the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Umesh Chandra Shukla, Shivangi Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ram Rakhan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) petitioner within a week thereafter. November 14, 2025 A.Nigam WRIA No. 13241 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench