BIND LAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME GOVT. OF U.P. LKO.
BAIL/9746/2025 · 2025-10-10
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197228 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197228 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9746 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and Sri Sanjay Kumar Yadav, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of complainant. The Vakalatnama is taken on record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.92 of 2025, under Sections 69, 115(2), 351(3), 352 of BNS, Police Station Sadullanagar, District Balrampur. 3. The FIR in question has been lodged through an application under Section 173(4) of BNSS. It was alleged that on 28.04.2025, the applicant came to the home of the informant and enticed her for merry under the false pretext. The age of the victim is 20 years. It was also alleged that the applicant took certain cloths etc. It was also stated that physical relations were formed before marriage and a video was also made. Subsequently, it was also alleged that physical relations were formed without the consent of the informant on the threat of making the video viral. 4. The Counsel for the informant states that the informed was being forced to form physical relations. 5. Learned A.G.A. also opposed the bail prayer. 6. Considering the age of the victim around 20 years; there being no recovery of video as alleged in the FIR; physical relations were formed on Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Chandresh Mani Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Bind Lal .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Govt. Of U.P. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
various occasions and the fact that the applicant is in custody since 08.08.2025 and has no criminal history, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 7.
Let the applicant Bind Lal be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 10, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 9746 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench