Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 197223 (ALL)

ABDUL HADI AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/375/2025 · 2025-10-07

Abdul Moin, Babita Rani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 375 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondents nos.1 to 3 and Sri Prem Shanker Dwivedi, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.4. 2. Instant petition has been filed praying for quashing of the first information report dated 21.12.2024, bearing No. 0183 of 2024 under Sections 115(2), 352 & 351(3) of B.N.S., 2023 & Sections 3(1)(Da) & 3(1) (Dha) Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (Amendment 2025) lodged at Police Station Bewana, District Ambedkar Nagar. Further prayer is for a mandamus commanding the respondents not to harass the petitioners in pursuance to the aforesaid FIR. 3. Upon filing of the petition, it was contended that the petitioners and respondent No.4 have entered into a compromise vide the compromise deed dated 02.01.2025, a copy of which is Annexure-2 to the petition. 4. This Court vide order dated 17.01.2025 had required the compromise deed to be placed before the learned Senior Registrar of this Court for verification of the said compromise. 5. In pursuance to the order of this Court dated 17.01.2025, the Senior Registrar of this Court vide his report dated 22.01.2025 has verified the compromise between the petitioners and respondent no.4. 6. As per the said compromise, the petitioners and respondent no.4 have agreed to end the dispute between themselves amicably. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kumar Nayak Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Abdul Hadi And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 7. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is allowed. The proceedings of FIR No.0183 of 2024 under Sections 115(2), 352 & 351(3) of B.N.S., 2023 & Section 3(1)(Da), & 3(1) (Dha) Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (Amendment 2025), lodged at Police Station Bewana, District Ambedkar Nagar, are hereby quashed. 8. It is further provided that in case any compensation has been paid by the State to the victim, it is open for the State to recover the same as the matter has been compromised between the parties. . (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) October 7, 2025 Reena/- CRLP No. 375 of 2025 2 Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench