SRI NIVAS v. THE COURT OF SUB DISTT. MAGISTRATE GONDA AND 8 OTHERS
A227/6801/2025 · 2025-11-21
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197207 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197207 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6801 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Sri Santosh Kumar Yadav the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Pradip Kumar Pandey, the learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.
2. Keeping in view the reliefs sought and the order proposed to be passed issuance of notice to the opposite parties is dispensed with.
3. By means of the instant petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction to the Sub Divisional Magistrate (Sadar), Gonda, U.P. to decide restoration application bearing No.T202408800412620 in Appeal under Section 6-A of Panchayat Raj Act expeditiously.
4. The copy of order sheet of the proceedings before the learned trial court indicates that on numerous dates proceedings have been adjourned without assigning any reasons.
5. In these circumstances, the petition is disposed of and a direction is issued to Sub Divisional Magistrate (Sadar), Gonda, U.P. to decide restoration application bearing No.T202408800412620 in Appeal under Section 6-A of Panchayat Raj Act expeditiously in accordance with law without granting any unnecessary adjournment to any of the parties and by fixing dates at short intervals. November 21, 2025 Ram. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kumar Yadav, Nan Babu Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Sri Nivas .....Petitioner(s) The Court Of Sub Distt. Magistrate Gonda And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench