Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 197198 (ALL)

RAKESH NAYAK v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS

CMRAD/181/2025 · 2025-11-12

Pankaj Bhatia

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. - 181 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Present review application has been filed seeking review of the order dated 14.07.2025 whereby a cost of Rs.25,000/- was imposed for filing the petition as a PIL where personal cause was being espoused. The said application is accompanied by a delay condonation application. 2. Delay is condoned. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that no personal cause was involved. 4. Considering the submission, prima-facie, no material for review as prescribed under Section 114 CPC or otherwise is existent. 5. Present review application lacks merit and is accordingly dismissed/rejected. November 12, 2025 nishant Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vijay Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Rakesh Nayak .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench