RAKESH NAYAK v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS
CMRAD/181/2025 · 2025-11-12
Pankaj Bhatia
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197198 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197198 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. - 181 of 2025
Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Present review application has been filed seeking review of the order dated 14.07.2025 whereby a cost of Rs.25,000/- was imposed for filing the petition as a PIL where personal cause was being espoused. The said application is accompanied by a delay condonation application.
2. Delay is condoned.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that no personal cause was involved.
4. Considering the submission, prima-facie, no material for review as prescribed under Section 114 CPC or otherwise is existent.
5. Present review application lacks merit and is accordingly dismissed/rejected. November 12, 2025 nishant Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vijay Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Rakesh Nayak .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench