RADHEY SHYAM UPADHYAY v. SRI MUKTA TYAGI, ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT NO. 20, SULTANPUR SULTANPUR
CAPL/2788/2025 · 2025-10-10
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197193 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197193 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2788 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. Case has been called out in the revised list. Shri Gaurav Mehrotra, learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that the judgment and order of the Writ Court has been complied with. Copy of the order passed by the respondent in pursuance of the judgment and order passed by the Writ Court has been provided to this Court during the course of argument,which is taken on record. Neither the learned counsel for the applicant is present nor any request has been made on his behalf for adjournment of the case. In view of the aforesaid, the present case is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution. Notice issued, if any, stands discharged. October 10, 2025 Ashish Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rudresh Pandey, Amit Tripathi, Suneel Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Gaurav Mehrotra (Manish Kumar,J.) Radhey Shyam Upadhyay .....Applicant(s) Sri Mukta Tyagi, Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Court No. 20, Sultanpur Sultanpur .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench