RAJ NAYAN and ORS. v. STATE OF U.P.THRU.ADDL.CHIEF/PRIN.SECY.INDUS.DEVELOPMENTandORS
WRIC/15912/2021 · 2025-10-27
Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197185 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197185 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 15912 of 2021 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. The present writ petition has been appearing under the heading of
"Priority Cases".
2. None appears on behalf of the petitioners even in the revised call.
3. Learned Standing Counsel appears on behalf of the State-respondents.
4. Upon perusal of the record, it appears that no cause of action survives, and accordingly, the matter is consigned to record.
5. The writ petition is disposed of.
6. In the event, the petitioners are of the view that the cause of action still survives, liberty is granted to the petitioner(s) to file an application for recall/variation/modification of this order in accordance with law. October 27, 2025 Ashutosh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Umesh Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) :
C.S.C., A.S.G. (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Raj Nayan And Ors. .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Thru.Addl.Chief/Prin.Secy.Indus.Developmentandors.....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench