VIRENDRA KUMAR VERMA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. (LAW) LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/15026/2025 · 2025-12-19
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197184 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197184 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15026 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayer:-
"(1) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to consider regularization of the petitioners from the date their juniors namely, Raju Pal and Mukesh Yadav were regularized in service i.e. w.e.f. 31.05.2004."
3. Since petitioner's grievances would require consideration of factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to make a fresh representation before concerned authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.
4. The petition stands disposed of. December 19, 2025 prabhat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahendra Pratap Singh, Ranjit Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Virendra Kumar Verma And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Law) Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench