YELAMARTI SATYA NARAYANA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/13804/2025 · 2025-05-21
K Suresh Reddy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19718 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19718 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVAT (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF Ma45 \o TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE \ MS O fi--. o O PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 13804 OF 2025 / Between:
1. Yelamarti Satya Narayana, S/o. Y Sri Ramulu, Male, aged about 67 years R/o. H. No. 2-65, Perugugudem Village Denduluru Mandal, Eluru District Andhra Pradesh
2. Yelamarti Venkanna Babu, S/d. Y Satyanarayana, Male, aged about 38 years R/o. H. No. 2-65, Perugugudem Village Denduluru Mandal, Eluru District Andhra Pradesh ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Revenue Department, AP Secretariat Velagapudi, Amaravati
2. The District Collector, Eluru District
3. The Tahsildar, Denduluru Mandal, Eluru District
4. The Village Revenue Officer, Perugugudem Village, Denduluru Mandal Eluru District
5. Perugugudem Grama Panehayat, Denduluru Mandal, Eluru District, Rep. by its Panchayat Secretary ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ,
Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring action of the Respondents in illegally interfering and attempting to demolish boundary wall which is being constructed on the Petitioners property admeasuring 507 sq. yds. situated m H. No. 2-65, Perugugudem Village, Denduluru Mandal, Eluru District, Andhra Pradesh without issuance of any notice, nor without following due process of law as illegal, arbitrary, high handed, violative of Article 21 and 300A of the Constitution and consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Petitioners property. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased maybe pleased to DIRECT the Respondents herein not to interfere into the peaceful possession and enjoyment of Petitioners property admeasuring 507 sq. yds. situated in H. No. 2-65, Perugugudem Village, Denduluru Mandal, Eluru District, Andhra Pradesh without following due process of law pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI PEDDIBHOTLA VENKATA SAI RAJESH Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE
r Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI Y.KOTESWARA RAO, ADVOCATE (SC FOR GRAM PANCHAYATH) The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010276082025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3239] THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 13804/2025 Between; Yelamarti Satya Narayana and Others ...PET!T!ONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner{S):
1.PEDDIBHOTLA VENKATA SAI RAJESH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following ORDER: The present writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondent Nos.4 and 5 in trying to demolish the boundary wall, which is being constructed on the petitioner’s property admeasuring in an extent of 507 square yards, situated at house No.2-65 of Perugugudem village, Denduluru Mandal, Eluru District. 2. Today when the matter is taken up, the learned Standing counsel appearing for respondent No.5 produced written instructions dated
22.05.2025. 2
3. As per the written instructions of the S**" respondent, they are not demolishing the proposed construction of compound wall of the petitioner, situated in the above said property. 4.
Recording the said statement made by the 5’^ respondent, this petition is closed, as no orders are required to be passed. No order costs. writ as to As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K J RAJA BABU ASSISTANTREGISTR A ^ //TRUE COPY// r,SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to Sri Peddibhotia Venkata Sai Rajesh Advocate [OPUC]
2. One CC to Sri Y.Koteswara Rao, SC for Gram Panchayath [OPUC]
3. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] , -
4. Two CD Copies MBT
HIGH COURT ! DATED:22/05/2025
ORDER WP. No. 13804 of 2025 O _ « . 1 . w nnor O X 2 6 MAY 2025 ^ ^ . Current ueciion CLOSING THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS