MR VINODKUMAR SINGH @ TULASIRAM SINGH v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
CRL.P/3621/2025 · 2025-04-07
Hemant Chandangoudar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19717 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19717 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:14705 CRL.P No. 3621 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3621 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
1.
MR. VINODKUMAR SINGH @ TULASIRAM SINGH S/O LATE B.N. PURUSHOTHAMA SINGH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.104 SRI. CHAMUNDESHWARI KALYANA MANTAPA ROAD BEHIND CHRIST PUBLIC SCHOOL NYAYANGA BADAVANE MYSORE-570 026.
2.
SMT. LAKHMIDEVI W/O PURUSHOTHAMA SINGH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.104 SRI. CHAMUNDESHWARI KALYANA MANTAPA ROAD BEHIND CHRIST PUBLIC SCHOOL NYAYANGA BADAVANE, MYSORE-570 026. …PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SANDEEP .K, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY KADUGODI POLICE STATION BANGALORE CITY BANGALORE DISTRICT- 560 001.
REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR.
Digitally signed by R HEMALATHA Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:14705 CRL.P No. 3621 of 2025
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT BUILDING.
2.
ANUSHA .G W/O VINODKUMAR SINGH AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS R/AT OPP-URBAN OASIS APARTMENT THIRUMALA BEKARI CROSS 5TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN CHANNASANDRA, KADUGODI BANGALORE-560 067. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. LAKSHMAN .B, HCGP FOR R1;
SRI. AJAY SHANKAR SINGH, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.8450/2023 PENDING ON THE FILE OF I ADDL. CJM, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT AT BANGALORE FOR THE OFFENCE P/US/ 498A, 504, 506 AND 34 OF IPC, REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1, KADUGODI POLICE BASED ON THE COMPLAINT LODGED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
ORAL ORDER
1. The petitioners, who are being prosecuted for offences punishable under Sections 498A, 504, 506, and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, have approached this Court seeking appropriate relief.
2. The prosecution alleges that accused No.1– the husband, and accused No.2– the mother-in-law, subjected
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:14705 CRL.P No. 3621 of 2025
the defacto complainant to mental and physical cruelty, and also threatened her with dire consequences.
3. The parties are present before this Court and have filed a Joint Affidavit stating that they have amicably resolved the dispute through mediation. As per the terms of the settlement, the marriage between accused No.1 and the defacto complainant has been dissolved by mutual consent in M.C. No.263/2023. Respondent No.2 – the defacto complainant, has agreed to withdraw all allegations against the petitioners and has no objection to quashing the impugned proceedings.
4. The Joint Affidavit is taken on record.
5. Although the offences alleged against the petitioners are cognizable and non-compoundable, considering the fact that the parties have amicably settled the dispute, subjecting the petitioners to trial would serve no useful purpose. The likelihood of conviction, in view of the settlement, is remote and bleak. In such circumstances, the continuation of criminal proceedings would amount to an abuse of the process of law.
6. Accordingly, I pass the following:
- 4 -
NC: 2025:KHC:14705 CRL.P No. 3621 of 2025
ORDER
i) The Criminal Petition is allowed;
ii) The impugned proceedings in C.C.No.8450/2023 registered by respondent No.1 - Kadugodi Police on the file of the I Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru Rural District at Bengaluru.
iii) I.A.No.1/2025 does not survive for
consideration and is hereby rejected.
Sd/- (HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR) JUDGE
NBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14