Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010215832025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/1073/2025 RUPAM DAS @ RUPA S/O LATE RANJIT DAS RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SONAI ROAD, PS SILCHAR, DISTCACHAR, ASSAM 788001 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY PP ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S C BISWAS, MS. U NANDA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : Crl.A./471/2023 RUPAM DAS @ RUPA S/O LATE RANJIT DAS
VILL.- SONAI ROAD P.S.- SILCHAR DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM. VERSUS
Page No.# 2/3 THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.
REP. BY P.P. ASSAM.
2:RAKHI RANI DAS W/O SRI KRISHNA MANGAL DAS
R/O ITKHOLA RAMAKRISHNA PALLY P.O. AND P.S.- SILCHAR DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : MR. S C BISWAS Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.
B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
ORDER 19.09.2025 This I.A has been preferred in seeking correction of the Order dated 15.09.2025 passed in I.A(Crl.) No. 1246/2023 in Crl. A. No. 471/2023.
2. It is stated that this Court vide the aforesaid order had granted bail to the applicant, but in the order so passed, the Special (POCSO) Case No. 22/2018 before the Special Judge, POCSO, Cachar, Silchar was omitted to be mentioned because of which the order granting bail would not be effective.
3. Having perused the aforesaid order, the same is modified by adding the words “in connection with Special (POCSO) Case No. 22/2018 before the Special
Page No.# 3/3 Judge, POCSO, Cachar, Silchar”, after the 4th paragraph in the 3rd page of the
order beginning with the words “The applicant” and ending with the words
“Cachar, Silchar”.
4. Rest of the order shall remain the same and both the Orders dated 15.09.2025 and this Order dated 19.09.2025 shall be read together.
5. I.A stands disposed off.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant