Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19715 (MAD)

THENMOZHI v. BALAKRISHNAN

SA/205/2019 · 2025-04-09

A A Nakkiran

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SA. No. 205 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-04-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN SA.No. 205 of 2019 THENMOZHI W/o. Subramanian, Nannai Village, Perambalur Tk And Dt. ...Appellant Vs 1. BALAKRISHNAN S/o. Ramasamy Padayachi, R/o. Enthal Village Thittakudi Tk. 2. Alaga Padayachi (Since 2nd defendant in the suit & 2nd respondent in the appeal remained exparte, he is not impleaded in the Second Appeal) ...Respoondent(s) For Appellant(s): No appearance For Respondent(s): M/s. P. Valliappan G.R.M. Palamiappan For R1 (in Sr Stage) ORDER Earlier, when the Second Appeal was posted on 08.04.2025 for hearing, there was no representation for the appellant and hence, Registry was directed to post this case today under the caption, 'for dismissal' and accordingly, it is listed today. 2. Even today, inspite of the name of the appellant being printed in the cause-list, the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis appellant has not chosen to appear before this court. Hence, this Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. 09-04-2025 gv To 1. BALAKRISHNAN S/o. Ramasamy Padayachi, R/o. Enthal Village Thittakudi Tk. 2. Alaga Padayachi (since 2nd Defednatn In The Suit And 2nd Respondent In The Appeal Remained Exparte, He Is Not Impleaded In The Second Appeal. 3.The Principal District Judge, Perambalur. 4. The Subordinate Judge, Civil Judge, Ariyalur. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.A.NAKKIRAN.,J gv SA.No. 205 of 2019 09.04.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis