M/S 4137 SUDEEP KUMAR PANDEY SECURITY AGENCY v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
W.P.(C)/8950/2019 · 2025-08-01
Amit Sharma
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19715 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19715 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8950/2019&CM APPL. 36944/2019
M/S 4137 SUDEEP KUMAR PANDEY SECURITY AGENCY .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Shakti Chand Jaidwal, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
.....Respondents
Through: Mr. P. S. Singh, CGSC with Ms. Minakshi Singh, Mr. Ashutosh Bharti and Mr. Rajneesh Kr. Sharma, Advs. for UOI
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
O R D E R %
01.08.2025
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks the following prayers: -
“(a) Issue appropriate orders for quashing the Impugned Order dated 29.07.2019 passed by the Respondent No. 1, disempaneling the Petitioner Security Agency from the active list of DGR empaneled security agencies; (b) Direct the Respondent No. 1 to permit the Petitioner to continue providing security services to all the three CPSUs at four locations in accordance with ongoing Contract Agreements with them and not to direct the CPSUs for cancellation of their ongoing contracts; (c) Direct the Respondent No. 1 to renew/extend the Empanelment Certificate of the Petitioner till his permissible age of 60 years in terms of Para 5(c) of DGR guidelines specified in Office Memorandum dated 09.07.2012, unaffected by this disempanelment episode. (d) Award cost of this litigation to the Petitioner Security Agency as may be deemed just and appropriate by this Hon'ble Court and /or; (e) Pass any other or further orders as may be deemed fit and proper in the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/08/2025 at 15:37:52
facts and circumstances of the case.”
3.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner has since passed away and on instructions of the legal heirs submits that they do not wish to assist the present petition.
4. The same stands abated and disposed of accordingly.
5. Pending applications if any also stand disposed of.
AMIT SHARMA, J AUGUST 1, 2025/kr/dj
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/08/2025 at 15:37:52