Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 197147 (ALL)

SHARDA PRASAD KATIYAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

BAIL/9962/2025 · 2025-10-15

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9962 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State as well as Mr. Jitendra Kumar, learned counsel for the informant, whose vakalatnama filed today is taken on record. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.71 of 2025 under Sections 80(2), 85 BNS and Section 3/4 of DP Act, P.S.- Gaidas Bujurg, District- Balrampur. 3. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is the father-in-law and similarly situated co-accused (sister-in-law of the victim) has already been enlarged on bail vide order dated 10.02.2025. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances, ground of parity and the post- mortem report, and there being nothing specific against the applicant who is aged about 60 years, is in custody since 07.07.2025 and has no previous criminal antecedent, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant- Sharda Prasad Katiyar be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to her furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vimal Kishor Singh, Premkant Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sharda Prasad Katiyar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 15, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 9962 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench