SURENDRA MALAWAT SON OF SHRI AMAR SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLR/928/2025 · 2025-09-23
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19714 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19714 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:39102] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 928/2025 Surendra Malawat Son Of Shri Amar Singh, Aged About 35 Years, Presently Resident At 34, Paldi Meena, Highway Royal City Agra Road, Jaipur (Raj) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hitesh Jain Rana For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Gupta, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order 23/09/2025
1. The instant revision petition has been preferred under Section 438 r/w Section 442 of B.N.S.S. against the order dated 02.05.2025 passed by the Court of learned Special Judge NDPS Cases, Jaipur Metro-I, Jaipur, in connection with F.I.R. No.122/2025, registered at Police Station Kanota, Jaipur East for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 8/20 of N.D.P.S. Act, whereby the application preferred by the petitioner for 'supurdagi' of vehicle-in-question i.e. Swift Car bearing Registration No.RJ-19- CF-2004, was dismissed with liberty to file a fresh after completion of investigation or inventory.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a registered owner of the vehicles-in-question and, therefore, he is entitled for custody of the vehicle on ‘supurdagi’. Learned counsel further contends that the vehicle should not be permitted
[2025:RJ-JP:39102] (2 of 2) [CRLR-928/2025] to remain parked in the Police Station as the same shall gather rust and shall not remain useful. Learned counsel prays that the present revision petition may be allowed, the impugned order be quashed & set aside and the vehicle-in-question be released on ‘supurdagi’ to the petitioner.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the
submissions made herein-above.
4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the entire material made available on record.
5. Looking to the overall facts & circumstances of the case, the Learned Court below, after considering all the facts, has passed a reasoned order, which is just & proper. No illegality, infirmity or error has been committed by the learned Court below in the aforesaid order.
6. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed.
7. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAURABH /41