HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13512 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Surendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 &2. Instant petition has been filed with the following prayers:- "(i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the opposite parties to consider total period of service for the purpose of calculation and payment of gratuity under Payment of Gratuity Act 1972, including the period of about 23 years in muster role on wages with the period of regular service and to modify the order of gratuity annexed as annexure no. 1. (ii) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the opposite parties to pay to the petitioners the arrears of gratuity with interest of 12% per annum." Learned counsel for the respondent Mandi Parishad submits that payment of gratuity Act, 1972 is not applicable to the services of the petitioner and rather the Government Order dated 22.6.1987 would attract regarding payment of gratuity. He submits that the petitioner has prayed for payment of gratuity as per the provisions of the payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that any change in the provisions at the level of Mandi Parishad would be subject to Section 5 of Payment of Gratuity Act 1972 and, therefore, in this view of the matter, the Government Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajiv Srivastava, Avadhesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Surendra Kumar Singh Umesh Kumar Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) Director Rajya Krishi Utpadan Mandi Parishad U.P. Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Order dated 22.6.1987 is redundant. After the aforesaid arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that interest of justice would be subserved, if this Hon'ble Court may be given liberty to the petitioner to move an application before the respondent no.1/ Director, Rajya Krishi Utpadan Mandi Parisahd, while claiming payment of gratuity under the applicable laws and the respondent no.1 is directed to consider and decide the same within time fixed. Learned counsel for the respondent Mandi Parishad has no objection to the submission aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the case, the petitioner is given liberty to make a fresh representation while claiming of payment of gratuity under the relevant laws, within 15 days and in case such representation is made, the respondent no.1, Director, Rajya Krishi Utpadan Mandi Parisahd is directed to consider and decide the same, within a period of two month, from the date of production of certified copy of this order before him. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. November 21, 2025 Ram Murti WRIA No. 13512 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench