MANISH DUBEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/11145/2025 · 2025-11-17
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197122 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197122 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11145 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State. Whereas, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the informant despite notice.
2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.149 of 2025 under Sections 80, 85(2), 352, 351(2) BNS, P.S.- Kotwali Nagar, District- Pratapgarh.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the co-accused, namely, Nitesh Kumar Dubey has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 17.11.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.11144 of 2025. Therefore, applicant is also entitled to be released on bail.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering and adopting the reasoning as contained in the order dated 17.11.2025, ground of parity, coupled with the fact that the applicant is in custody since 01.05.2025, having no criminal antecedent, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant- Manish Dubey be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Puttu Lal Misra, Prince Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Manish Dubey .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence
November 17, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 11145 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench