HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10150 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Sri Shailendra Singh Chauhan, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the respondents No.3 and 4 by filing his vakalatnama in Court today, which is taken on record. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the writ petitioners have sought for the following substantial reliefs:- "a. Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction directing Opposite Party No. 4 to permit the petitioner to deposit the vending fees and further direct to Opposite Party No.4 to issue the vending certificate to Petitioners for their respective shop(s) situated at Vending Zone-1, Golaganj ward i.e., (Nari Shiksha Niketan), Kaiserbagh, Lucknow. b. Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction directing Opposite Party No. 4 and 6 not to eveict the petitioners till issuance of vending certificates to the petitioners from their working place." 3. Sri Anand Pal Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, submits that the petitioners have been registered and have been allotted a vending zone. However, no vending certificate is being issued and the petitioners are being harassed by the police. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has placed Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Pal Singh, Avinash Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Namit Sharma Ram Dayal Pal And 7 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Nagar Vikas Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) reliance on an office noting wherein the place where he wants to carry on the vending activity is proposed. 5. Per contra, Sri Shailendra Singh Chauhan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents No.3 and 4, submits that the petitioners are trying to carry out their vending in a place which is a no-vending zone. 6. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and upon perusal of the record, it transpires that the petitioners have already been allotted a vending zone, but they are not carrying out vending in that particular zone and instead seek another zone, which is still proposed and has not yet been decided. 7. In view of above, the present writ petition is bereft of merits and the same is, accordingly, dismissed. October 17, 2025 cks/- WRIC No. 10150 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench