[2025:RJ-JP:23063] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6464/2025 1. Taufik S/o Shri Alimohammad, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Kanchanner, Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (Presently Accused Confined In Central Jail Deeg). 2. Asif S/o Shri Alimohammad, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Kanchanner, Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (Presently Accused Confined In Central Jail Deeg). 3. Sahib S/o Late Shri Issak, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Kanchanner, Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (Presently Accused Confined In Central Jail Deeg). 4. Isha Mohammed S/o Shri Nihala, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Kanchanner, Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (Presently Accused Confined In Central Jail Deeg). 5. Sonu Singh S/o Suchha Singh, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Sahasan, Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (Presently Accused Confined In Central Jail, Deeg). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6862/2025 1. Mauhammad Salim S/o Juharu, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Samdhara, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg). 2. Najim Khan S/o Jamshed, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Samdhara, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg). 3. Aalim S/o Hanif, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Nagla Dubokar, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg). ----Petitioners Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Agarwal Mr. Ankit Khandelwal [2025:RJ-JP:23063] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6464/2025] For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, Dy. GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA (V. J.) Order 11/06/2025 1. These bail applications have been filed by the accused- petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in respect of FIR No. 135/2025 registered at Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg for the offences punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 317(5), 303(2), 308(2), 313 & 61(2)(a) of BNS and under Section 66D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in the FIR in question whereas, they have not committed any offence mentioned in the FIR. Learned counsel further submits that the allegations levelled against them are triable by the Magistrate and there is no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners. Counsel also submits that the accused-petitioners are behind the bars since long time. Trial is likely to take considerably long time. Therefore, the accused-petitioners may be allowed to enlarge on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed these bail applications. 4. Considered the submissions made at Bar. 5. Taking into consideration, the alleged offences are triable by the Magistrate and the accused-petitioners are behind the bars since long time and they would no longer be required for custodial [2025:RJ-JP:23063] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6464/2025] interrogation, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these Bail Applications are hereby allowed. The accused-petitioners Taufik S/o Shri Alimohammad, Asif S/o Shri Alimohammad, Sahib S/o Late Shri Issak, Isha Mohammed S/o Shri Nihala, Sonu Singh S/o Suchha Singh, Mauhammad Salim S/o Juharu, Najim Khan S/o Jamshed & Aalim S/o Hanif shall be released on bail in pursuance of FIR No. 135/2025 registered at Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- along with two sureties of the like amount. That apart, the accused-petitioners shall also follow the conditions as under:- (i) They shall not tamper with any evidence, nor would influence the witnesses in the case. (ii) They shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. (iii) They shall co-operate in the trial and shall attend each and every date of hearing in the trial, until and unless their presence is exempted by the trial Court. 7. In case of failure of observance of the conditions, a ground for cancellation of bail would arise. 8. Office is directed to place a copy of this order in connected case file. (ANAND SHARMA (V. J.)),J DIVYA /210-211