ANJUM SADAB v. STATE OF U.P. THRU SECY.BASIC EDU.CIVIL SECTT.LUCKNOW and ORS.
WRIA/13267/2016 · 2025-11-21
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197101 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197101 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13267 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 21, 2025 Muk Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Narendra Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ajay Kumar, Shobhit Mohan Shukla (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Anjum Sadab .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy.Basic Edu.Civil Sectt.Lucknow And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench