Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 197097 (ALL)

DINESH KUMAR TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE U.P. GOVT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WPIL/1189/2025 · 2025-11-21

Subhash Vidyarthi

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1189 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Case called out in the revised list. Nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition nor any request for adjournment of the case is made. 2. Heard Shri Anil Kumar Kushwaha, the learned Standing Counsel for the State and Shri Mohan Singh, the learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha. 3. By means of the instant petition filed in public interest, the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction for removal of encroachment over the public land bearing gata No.489 measuring 0.0200 hectares situated at Village Purab Gaon, Pargana and Tehsil Milkipur, District Ayodhya, which is recorded as Chak Marg. 4. The petitioner had raised a complaint in Jan Sunvai proceedings whereof have been annexed as Annexure No.3 to the petitioner as per which a spot inspection was conducted on the complaint of the petitioner, the Chak Marg was demarcated and demarcation points were affixed. Now, there is no encroachment on the Chak Marg. 5. In these circumstances, as per the averments made in the writ petition itself, the grievance of the petitioner already stands redressed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. November 21, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prabhakar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Dinesh Kumar Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue U.P. Govt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench