Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19708 (GAU)

CHANDRA KANTA DEKA v. THE STATE BANK OF INDIA

I.A.(Civil)/3215/2025 · 2025-10-14

Sanjay Kumar Medhi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010215862025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3215/2025 in WP(C)/5440/2025 CHANDRA KANTA DEKA S/O GAHIN DEKA, PROPRIETOR OF DHRISTISMITA SERVICE STATION, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE GERIMARI CHAPORI, PO AND PS MANGALDAI, DIST DARRANG ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE BANK OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN ,STATE BANK BHAWAN, MADAME KAMA ROAD, NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA, 400021 2:THE REGIONAL MANAGER STATE BANK OF INIDA HEAD OFFICE GUWAHATI G S ROAD OPP. ASSAM SACHIVALAYA DISPUR SORUMATARIA GUWAHATI 781006 3:THE BRANCH MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA MANGALDOI BRANCH L.N.B ROAD MANGALDOI DIST DARRANG ASSAM 784125 4:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE (CEO) INDIAN CYBERCRIME COORDINATION CENTER MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS Page No.# 2/3 5TH FLOOR NDCC BUILDING JAI SINGH ROAD NEW DELHI 110001 5:THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND ECONOMICS OFFENCES GOVT. OF ASSAM SRIMANTAPUR OPP. BORDER OFFICE BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI 32 6:THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION THRISSUR CITY KERALA 68000 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M AHMED, A. K. KANU Advocate for the Respondent : , BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 15.10.2025 Heard Shri M Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicant, who, by means of this application has sought for impleadment of the following parties as the respondent nos. 4, 5 and 6: “4. The Chief Executive (CEO), Indian Cybercrime Coordination Center, Ministry of Home Affairs, 5th floor, NDCC Building, Jai Singh Road, New Delhi- 110001. 5. The Additional Director General of Police, Bureau of Investigation & EconomicsOffences, Govt. Assam, Srimantapur Opposite Border Office Bhangagarh Guwahati – 32. Page No.# 3/3 6. The Station House Officer, Cyber Crime Police Station, Thrissur City, Kerala – 680001.” It is submitted that when the writ petition was instituted, due to inadvertence, the following parties were not arrayed as respondents who are necessary parties. Considering the facts and circumstances, the instant application is allowed by permitting the impleadment of the aforesaid parties as the respondent nos. 4, 5 and 6. JUDGE Comparing Assistant