HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15172 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to not press the prayer clause(i). Learned counsels for the respondents have no objection. In view of the above, the prayer is allowed. The counsel for the petitioners is permitted to struck of the prayer clause(i), during course of the day. The prayer clause (ii), (iii) and (iv) are repositioned as prayer clause (i), (ii) and (iii). Heard Mr. Umeshwar Pratap Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Akhilesh Pratap Singh, learned counsel for respondent no. 1, Ms. Aditi Singh, advocate, holding brief of Mr. Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 & 3 and perused the record. Instant petition has been filed with the following prayers:- "(I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding and directing the opposite party No. 1 to decide the representation of petitioners dated 21.11.2025, as contained in Annexure No. 5 to this writ petition. (II)Issue such other order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deem, fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case, in favour of the petitioner. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Umeshwar Pratap Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Akhilesh Pratap Singh, Ratnesh Chandra Ram Dayal Mishra And 8 Others .....Petitioner(s) Regional Commissioner E.P.F. Employees Fund Organization Office Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) (III) Allow the writ petition with cost." After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioners to move a fresh representation before the respondent no. 1 and he may be directed to consider & decide the same, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection to the contention aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merit of the case, the petitioners are permitted to move a fresh representation within period of 15 days, and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the respondent no. 1/Regional Commissioner, E.P.F. The Employees Fund Organization Officer, Vibhuti Khand, Lucknow, is hereby directed to consider and decide the same, within further period of eight weeks, in accordance with law, from the date, a certified copy of this order is produced before him. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is disposed of. It is further provided that while deciding the aforesaid representation by respondent no. 1, the requirement, if any, shall also be undertaken by respondent no. 2. December 19, 2025 Mayank WRIA No. 15172 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench