KRIPA SHANKER CHAUHAN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.DEPTT.OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT andORS
WRIA/3977/2017 · 2025-11-14
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197057 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197057 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 3977 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioners to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 14, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Birendra Pratap Singh, Rajneesh Kumar Pandey, Sameer Kalia, Shri Narayan Pandey, Vivekanand Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Kripa Shanker Chauhan And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Deptt.Of Rural Development Andors .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench