[2025:RJ-JP:23331] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6710/2025 Ramkaran Raigar S/o Lt. Sh. Mangilal, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Raigaron Ka Mohalla, Village Harmada, Police Station Bandersindri, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Is Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshat Chaudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, Addl. GA-cum- PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA (V. J.) Order 18/06/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.0037/2025 registered at Police Station Bander Sindri, District Ajmer for the offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2), 352 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner and the complainant belong to a common family. On 29.06.2021 the complainant and his father assaulted the petitioner. Therefore the petitioner has lodged a criminal case against them, and in that matter, the complainants are facing trial. [2025:RJ-JP:23331] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6710/2025] He further submits that as per the investigation it is reflected that the complainant and his brother were harassing the petitioner. Therefore in the exchange of heated discussions, such an incident has occurred. He further submits that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 09.05.2025 and the charge-sheet has already been filed against the petitioner. As per the injury report, out of four injuries three injuries are simple in nature and the fourth injury is also on a non-vital part and not dangerous to life. He further submits that the trial will take considerable time, and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Heard and considered the contentions made by the learned counsel for the parties and perused the challan papers. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner, and also the fact that the petitioner and the complainant belong to a common family and the incident occurred during a heated discussion, and none of the injuries are dangerous to life, the petitioner is in judicial custody since 09.05.2025 and the trial will take considerable time, without commenting any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that the accused-petitioner Ramkaran Raigar S/o Lt. Sh. Mangilal shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a [2025:RJ-JP:23331] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6710/2025] personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the petitioner shall not involve in other offence(s) of similar nature during currency of this bail. 8. The petitioner shall not temper with any evidence, nor would influence the witnesses in the case. (MANEESH SHARMA (V. J.)),J MAHIMA/93