HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10143 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Mr. Amit Kumar Singh files vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.4, being the landlord of the premises, the same is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. Learned counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the Electricity Distribution Company submit that electricity has been restored and accordingly, there is no further cause of action remaining. 4. Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondent No.4 submits that the petitioner is a trespasser and is not legally entitle to occupy the said premises. 5. In light of the same, we make it clear that grant of electricity shall not create any legal right with respect to the title on the premises. Since the electricity has been restored, nothing remains in this matter. 6. The compliance report filed by the Electricity Distribution Company is taken on record. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. October 27, 2025 Saurabh Yadav/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sandeep Kumar Ojha, Dilip Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Aprajita Bansal (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Atul Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Secy. Deptt. Energy Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench