HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10366 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed with the following main prayers: "It is therefore most respectfully prayed that in view of the facts and circumstances of the present case, it is expedient in the interest of justice that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to quash the charge-sheet dated 04.08.2023 and the summoning order dated 04.04.2024 issued in Case No. 3627/2024 (State Vs. Vinay Kumar and Others), arising out of FIR No. 289/2023, U/Ss 504, 506, 427 and 452 IPC (New Ss 352, 351(2)&(3), 324(4) and 333 BNS), Police Station- Inayat Nagar, District-Faizabad/Ayodhya, pending before the court of ACJM, Third, Faizabad/Ayodhya (Annexure No. 3 and 1), and also other consequential orders and proceedings. It is further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to stay the further proceedings of Case No. 3627/2024 (State Vs. Vinay Kumar and Others), arising out of FIR No.289/2023U/Ss 504, 506, 427 and 452 IPC (New Ss 352, 351(2)&(3), 324(4) and 333 BNS), Police Station- Inayat Nagar, District-Faizabad/Ayodhya, pending before the court of ACJM, Third, Faizabad/Ayodhya, during the pendency of the present criminal application under Section 528 B.N.S.S./ 482 Cr.P.C. before this Hon'ble Court." Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashish Kumar Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vinay Kumar Yadav And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home U.P. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press this application on merits. However, he submits that the applicants will surrender before the trial court and apply for bail. He prays that the applicants may be granted the benefit of the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in (AIR 2022 SC 3386). 4. It is, therefore, directed that in case the applicants surrender before the Court below within three weeks from today and prefer bail application, the trial court will decide the said bail application, as expeditiously as possible, taking into account the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 5. For a period of three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 6. The application stands disposed of. December 10, 2025 Sachin A482 No. 10366 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench