HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3658 of 2025 Court No. - 27 HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Sri Randhir Singh, learned counsel for the appellant, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State and Sri Devesh Jaiswal , learned counsel for Opposite Party No. 2. 2. The captioned criminal appeal has been filed by the appellant inter alia praying therein for the following reliefs:- "It is most respectfully prayed that this hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to set-aside the impugned summoning order dated 28.09.2020 passed by the Learned Sepcial Judge SC/ST Act Lucknow in Sessions Trial No. 1361 of 2020, Case Crime No. 270 of 2019, under Sections 379, 504, 506 of IPC and 3(1) Da, Dha of SC/ST Act, P.S. Mall District- Lucknow and also st aside charge sheet dated 3.07.2019. It is further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set-aside the entre proceedings of the aforesaid Sessions No." 3. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant and learned counsel for Opposite Party No.2, at the very outset, have submitted that the parties have already settled their dispute through a compromise and had executed a compromise deed on 03.09.2025, which is available at Pg. Nos. 33 to 37 of this criminal revision. It has further been submitted by the learned counsels appearing for the parties that the offences, subject matter of this criminal appeal, are petty in nature and therefore, parties can settle their dispute through compromise. It has also been submitted that this Court Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Randhir Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Devesh Jaiswal Samar Bahadur Singh @ Rajnu Singh .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) may direct the learned trial court to verify the veracity of the compromise entered into between the parties and thereafter to issue a certified copy of the verification order to the parties. 4. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the parties and it appears that the parties have entered into a compromise and have settled their dispute and further a compromise deed had been executed between the parties, which is available at Page Nos. 33 to 37 of this criminal appeal. 5. In view of the aforesaid reasons, this criminal appeal is finally disposed of with a direction to the trial Court to verify the contents of the compromise deed available at Pg. Nos. 33 to 37 of this criminal appeal and thereafter to issue a certified copy of the order of verification to the parties. 6. After the compromise is verified by the trial court, it would be open for the appellant to approach this Court again by fling a fresh criminal appeal. 7. The office is directed to return the certified copy of the compromise deed available at Page Nos. 33 to 37 of this criminal appeal to the learned counsel for the appellant for being presented before the trial court. 8. It is also provided that the appellant and Opposite Party No. 2 shall appear before the trial court on 21.11.2025. 9. Till verification of the compromise by the trial court, it is provided that no coercive measures shall be adopted against the appellant. November 12, 2025 Anurag CRLA No. 3658 of 2025 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench