PAVAN KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 6 OTHERS
WPIL/1057/2025 · 2025-10-15
Subhash Vidyarthi
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197015 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197015 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1057 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Sri Kamal Kishore Tiwari, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Rahul Shukla, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State and Sri Mohan Singh, the learned counsel for the opposite party no.5/Gaon Sabha.
2. By means of the instant petition filed in the nature of public interest litigation the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a direction to the opposite parties to remove the illegal encroachment of public land bearing Gata No.414, measuring 0.0770 hectare situated in Village Kamasin, Pargana Tehsil and District Amethi which is recorded as naveen parti.
3. On the basis of instructions received from Tehsildar, Amethi, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has submitted that the proceedings under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code for removal of encroachments have already been instituted. Copy of written instructions provided to the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel is taken on record.
4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of by observing that proceeding instituted under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code for removal of encroachments shall be decided expeditiously in accordance with law. October 15, 2025
Ram. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kamal Kishor Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Pavan Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench