Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19701 (GAU)

M/S BORAIL VIEW REGENCY v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

I.A.(Civil)/3172/2025 · 2025-10-23

Sanjay Kumar Medhi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010183722025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) I.A.(Civil)/3172/2025 in WP(C)/4673/2025 M/S BORAIL VIEW REGENCY A PARTNERSHIP FIRM REPRESENTED BY ONE OF ITS PARTNER MR NILESH KUMAR AGARWAL HAVING ITS PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS AT PARK ROAD SILCHAR PO AND PS SILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM 788001 VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT GOVT OF INDIA SHRAM SHAKTI BHAWAN RAFI MARG NEW DELHI 110001 2:THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION (EPFO) SARDARGHAT ROAD SILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM 3:THE BRANCH MANAGER PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK SILCHAR BRANCH DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM 4:THE CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION (EPFO) HEAD OFFICE BHABISHYA NIDHI BHAWAN 14 BHIKAJI CAMA PLACE NEW DELHI 5:M/S CROZIERS AGENCY PRIVATE LIMITED REPRESENTED BY MR SOURANGSHU MOHAN DEV MANAGING DIRECTOR HAVING PLACE OF BUSINESS AT PARK ROAD SILCHAR ASSAM INDIA 788001 ------------ Advocate for : MR. K P MAHESWARI Advocate for : SC Page No.# 2/2 FOR PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION appearing for UNION OF INDIA AND ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 24.10.2025 Heard Shri D. Rathi, learned counsel for the applicant - writ petitioner, who, by means of this application has prayed for impleadment of the following entity as respondent no. 5- M/S CROZIERS AGENCY PRIVATE LIMITED, represented by Mr. Sourangshu Mohan Dev, Managing Director having place of business at PARK ROAD, SILCHAR, ASSAM, India, 788001. It is submitted that the said party would be necessary for a complete adjudication of the matter. After considering the facts and circumstances, the instant I.A. is allowed. The aforesaid party is accordingly permitted to be impleaded as respondent no. 5. I.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant