SHYAM NARAYAN YADAV AND ANR v. THE CHIEF MANAGER OF DENA BANK AND ORS
WPC/2306/2014 · 2025-01-30
Rajesh Shankar
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19700 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19700 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No.2306 of 2014 -----
1. Shyam Narayan Yadav, S/o Late Vishnu Chaudhary, R/o Qr. No.2258, Sector-8-A, Street No.11, Bokaro Steel City, P.O.-Sector-9(B) Road, P.S.-Harla, District-Bokaro.
2. Ajay Kumar, S/o Late Bhola Prasad Yadav, R/o at-Qr. No.2115, Sector-9 B, A-Road, Bokaro Steel City, P.O.- Sector-9 (B) Road, P.S.-Harla, Thana, District-Bokaro Steel City.
.......... Petitioners. -Versus-
1. The Chief Manager of Dena Bank, Bokaro Steel City, Bokaro.
2. The Branch Manager, Dena Bank, Bokaro Steel City, Bokaro.
3. The District Commissioner, Bokaro Steel City, Bokaro.
4. The Director, Steel Authority of India Limited.
5. The Managing Director, Steel Authority of India Limited, Bokaro Steel City, Bokaro.
6. The General Manager, Steel Authority of India Limited, Bokaro Steel Plant, Personal Department, Bokaro Steel City.
7. The Debts Recovery Tribunal Officer, Ranchi.
.......... Respondents.
8. Bikash Kumar @ Munna Reddi, S/o Ramnandan Prasad, R/o Quarter No.1022, Street No.26, P.O.-Sector-9 (B) Road, P.S.-Harla, District-Bokaro Steel City. Permanent R/o Village-Tajnipur, P.S.-Bind, District-Nalanda (Bihar).
9. Kapildeo Bishawkarma, S/o Shivsharan Bishawkarma, R/o Village-Shivlibari, P.O.-Kumardhubi, P.S.-Chirkunda, District-Dhanbad.
10. Ajay Kumar Mishra, S/o Sachitanand Mishra, the then Branch Manager, Dena Bank, Bokaro Steel City, Plot No.B/24, Town Centre, P.o. & P.S.-Sector-4, District- Bokaro Steel City, Bokaro. Permanent R/o D/42, Police Colony, P.O. & P.S.-Anishabad, District-Patna.
..........Private Respondents. -----
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioners : None For the SAIL : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate
Ms. Prerna Jhunjhunwala, Advocate -----
Order No.05
Date: 30.01.2025
1. No one appears on behalf of the petitioners despite repeated calls. Earlier also on 20th January, 2021 when the case was taken up through virtual mode, no one
appeared on behalf of the petitioners and the case was adjourned to be taken up in physical mode.
2. Since no one appearing on behalf of the petitioners to press the present writ petition, I see no reason to keep the same pending.
3. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non- prosecution.
4. I.A. No.4531 of 2014 also stands dismissed.
(Rajesh Shankar, J.) Vikas/
-2- W.P. (C) No.2306 of 2014