SURESH KUMAR KASHYAP @ SURESH KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. URBAN DEVELOPMENT LKO AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/1816/2025 · 2025-12-19
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196997 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196997 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 1816 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Ms. Pratiti, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petition has become infructuous as the same has lost its efficacy.
2. In view of aforesaid statement given by counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
4. Consigned to the records. December 19, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pratiti, Avinash Shukla, Vasudha Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Namit Sharma, Sankalp Dewari (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Suresh Kumar Kashyap @ Suresh Kumar And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Urban Development Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench