Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 196996 (ALL)

RAM PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. and ORS.

WPIL/17675/2020 · 2025-11-17

Rajan Roy, Rajeev Bharti

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 17675 of 2020 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Heard. 2. This is a petition in public interest. The allegation is that the land in question was recorded as forest land, but was illegally entered/recorded in the name of private opposite party. The proceedings for correction of the records pertaining to the land in question were initiated by the State Authorities on 08.11.2023 which are still pending. 3. We do not appreciate pendency of such proceedings for so long. Let the same be concluded positively within two months unless there is any legal impediment. In the event the proceedings are not concluded within two months or no legal impediment is shown, the same would be intimated to the petitioner and he shall be at liberty to file a fresh petition. 4. Shri Pratyush Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel shall communicate our order to the Collector, Raebareli for compliance. 5. With the aforesaid directions, this petition is disposed of. November 17, 2025 Anand/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sheikh Mohammad Ali, Nishi Chaudhary, Rinku Kumar Verma, Shreya Chaudhary Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Gopesh Tripathi, Tej Singh (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Ram Prasad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench