RAMKISHOR VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/15059/2025 · 2025-12-19
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196990 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196990 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15059 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed challenging notice dated 19th November 2025 pertaining to adjustment of pay scale of petitioner on the allegation that excess payment has been made to him.
3. From the record, it appears that the impugned order is in fact in the nature of a notice issued to petitioner to show cause why such re- determination of salary should not be made.
4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that reply to the notice has already been submitted.
5. In view thereof, the concerned authority is directed to pass appropriate orders considering reply submitted by petitioner.
6. The petition stands disposed of. December 19, 2025 prabhat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mewa Ram Satyarthi, Deepshikha Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Ramkishor Verma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench