- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:16554 WP No. 12166 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 12166 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI DHARMAPPA S/O LATE SRI THIMMEGOWDA @ VELAPURIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/AT 'NAMMANE', 11TH CROSS, BHAGATH SINGH ROAD, 2ND STAGE, JAYANAGARA, HASSAN - 573 201. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. N. CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. BHARGAV G., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. CORPORATION BANK THE MANAGER N.R.CIRCLE BRANCH HASSAN - 573 201. 2. THE REGIONAL MANAGER CORPORATION BANK REGIONAL OFFICE VOIP NO.5, MYSURU ROAD, 1ST FLOOR, ESI DIP BUIDLING, KASTURBA NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 026. Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:16554 WP No. 12166 of 2021 3. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER CORPORATION BANK ZONAL OFFICE, NO.2254, 'KOUSALAYA' 3RD FLOOR, VINOBA ROAD, MYSURU - 570 005. …RESPONDENTS THIS WP FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED E-AUCTION NOTICE DATED 21.03.2020 ISSUED BY THE R3 HEREIN VIDE ANNEXURE-A, GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAY THE IMPUGNED E-AUCTION NOTICE DATED 21.03.2020 ISSUED BY R3 HEREIN VIDE ANNEXURE-A OR IN THE ALTERNATE, DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS NOT TO DISPOSSESS THE PETITIONER AND HIS FAMILY FROM THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY, PENDING DISPOSAL OF THE ABOVE WRIT PETITION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:- a) Wherefore, the petitioner above named prays that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:16554 WP No. 12166 of 2021 b) Issue Writ of Certiorari or such other appropriate Writ or Order quashing the impugned E-Auction Notice dated 21.03.2020 vide No.OR/Auction/717/2018-19 issued by the third Respondent herein vide Annexure-A c) Pass such other Writ/s or Order/s, which are deemed to be fir in the nature and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the above petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Accepting his submission, petition is dismissed as infructuous. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE VS CT-SG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16