VINAY KUMAR JATAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. /ADDL. CHIEF SECY. RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/12144/2025 · 2025-10-15
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196965 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196965 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12144 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State counsel for opposite parties.
2. The present petition has been filed seeking the following main relief:-
"(a). To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding /directing the opposite parties to pay annual increment and other consequential service benefits to the petitioner w.e.f. 2020-2021 uptill now forthwith. ...."
3. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, without entering into merits of the case, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before opposite party No. 3 i.e. District Development Officer, District Bahraich. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be decided within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 15, 2025 Subodh/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Mani Tripathi, Anurag Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Vinay Kumar Jatav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. /Addl. Chief Secy. Rural Development Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench