Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 196964 (ALL)

HARISH KUMARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. GRAM VIKAS LKO. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIA/12572/2025 · 2025-10-17

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12572 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Sri Rajesh Kumar Verma,Advocate, has put in appearance by way of fling Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no. 7 and the same is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Dr. Uday Veer Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents no. 1 to 6 and Sri Rajesh Kumar Verma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 7. With the consent of learned counsel appearing on behalf of the contesting parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. A widow of an employee of Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (hereinafter referred to as "MGNREGA") at Vikas Khand, Pasgawan Khiri is before this Court claiming the benefit of Provident Fund, pension and other financial benefits as due to her on account of death of her husband who was working as a Technical Assistant and who died in harness on 10-05-2021. Sri Rajesh Kumar Verma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 7 states that the provident fund, pension and the link insurance is to be paid by the respondent no. 7 and for which purpose the petitioner has to fill in the requisite claim forms. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suresh Chandra Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Akhilesh Pratap Singh, Rajesh Kumar Verma Harish Kumari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Gram Vikas Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Sri Rajesh Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the respondent no. 78further contends that the aforesaid claim form shall be filled in by the petitioner and duly verified by the employer i.e the respondent no. 2- Commissioner Village Development Department MGNREGA Cell 21, Lucknow. Dr. Uday Veer Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing counsel states that the records of the petitioner's husband would be maintained by the Block Development Officer and in this case would be maintained by the respondent no. 6 i.e Block Development Officer, Pasagawan Khiri, Uttar Pradesh and he could make available the form provided the petitioner approaches the respondent no. 6 in this regard. Considering the aforesaid, the instant writ petition is disposed of. It is provided that the petitioner shall approach the respondent no. 6 i.e i.e Block Development Officer, Pasagawan Khiri, Uttar Pradesh on 29.10.2025 at 1100 AM. The requisite form shall be made available to the petitioner by the respondent no. 6 in accordance with the relevant rules. Upon the form being made available and being verified, the petitioner shall apply to the respondent no. 7 i.e Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar for the release of the dues as admissible to her which would be released in accordance with law within a period of next six weeks of the said form being made available. Dr. Uday Veer Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing counsel shall inform about this order to the respondent no. 6. October 17, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 12572 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench