IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 217 Raju Vinay Singh, IRSE, Secretary, Commission, Panchkula. CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings against the respondent for not complying the order dated 04.8.2023 Court in CWP Staff Selection Commission” whereby the petition was disposed of in terms of order of even date passed in CWP No.1285 of 2019 titled as “Manoj Kumar vs. Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Panchkula” vide which the writ petition was disposed of on the basis o made by learned counsel for the State to the effect that any representation is filed by the petitioners, the same will be considered in accordance with law and an appropriate speaking order will be passed within a period of eight wee COCP-480-2024 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.480 of 2024 Date of decision : Versus Vinay Singh, IRSE, Secretary, Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Panchkula. CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None for the petitioner. Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent for not complying the order dated 04.8.2023 (Annexure P-1) passed by a co Court in CWP-4526 of 2019 titled as “Rakesh and others vs. Haryana ff Selection Commission” whereby the petition was disposed of in terms of order of even date passed in CWP No.1285 of 2019 titled as “Manoj Kumar vs. Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Panchkula” vide which the writ petition was disposed of on the basis o made by learned counsel for the State to the effect that any representation is filed by the petitioners, the same will be considered in accordance with law and an appropriate speaking order will be passed within a period of eight wee 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 480 of 2024 (O & M) Date of decision :-10.09.2025 …..Petitioner Haryana Staff Selection …..Respondent HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana. Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent for not complying the order dated 1) passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Rakesh and others vs. Haryana ff Selection Commission” whereby the petition was disposed of in terms of order of even date passed in CWP No.1285 of 2019 titled as “Manoj Kumar vs. Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Panchkula” vide which the writ petition was disposed of on the basis of statement made by learned counsel for the State to the effect that “….in case any representation is filed by the petitioners, the same will be considered in accordance with law and an appropriate speaking order will be passed within a period of eight weeks of the receipt of VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.12 09.36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document any such representation and after passing of the order, in case any benefit is to be extended to the petitioners, the same will also be extended to them within a further period of four weeks. reply dated 14.6.2024 filed by way of affidavit of Shri Vinay Kumar, IRPS, Secretary Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Panchkula to submit that in compliance of the order dated 04.8.2023 (Annexure P 1) a Speaking Order dated 13.03.2024/01. been passed rejecting the claim of the petitioner survives in the present petition. respondent challenge the Speaking Order dated 13.03.2024/01.4.2024 (Annexure R-1) in accordance with law, if so advised. September Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-480-2024 (O & M) any such representation and after passing of the order, in case any benefit is to be extended to the petitioners, the same will also be extended to them within a further period of four weeks. Learned counsel for the respondent reply dated 14.6.2024 filed by way of affidavit of Shri Vinay Kumar, IRPS, Secretary Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Panchkula to submit that in compliance of the order dated 04.8.2023 (Annexure P 1) a Speaking Order dated 13.03.2024/01. been passed rejecting the claim of the petitioner survives in the present petition. Heard. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent-State, the present petition is being Needless to say, the petitioner shall be at liberty to challenge the Speaking Order dated 13.03.2024/01.4.2024 (Annexure 1) in accordance with law, if so advised. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. tember 10, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 any such representation and after passing of the order, in case any benefit is to be extended to the petitioners, the same will also be extended to them within a further period of four weeks.” Learned counsel for the respondent-State refers to the reply dated 14.6.2024 filed by way of affidavit of Shri Vinay Kumar, IRPS, Secretary Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Panchkula to submit that in compliance of the order dated 04.8.2023 (Annexure P- 1) a Speaking Order dated 13.03.2024/01.4.2024 (Annexure R-1) has been passed rejecting the claim of the petitioner; thus, no cause In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the State, the present petition is being disposed of. Needless to say, the petitioner shall be at liberty to challenge the Speaking Order dated 13.03.2024/01.4.2024 (Annexure 1) in accordance with law, if so advised. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.12 09.36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document