Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19696 (AP)

NAYAN RANKHAMBE v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/13793/2025 · 2025-05-21

K Suresh Reddy, Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY AND THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 13793 OF 2025 Between: 1. Smt.Nayan Rankhambe, wife of Sagar Rankhambe, aged about 33 years, Door No. 12-943-1, Savarala Street, Chinnabazar, Nellore City, SPSR Nellore District 2. Smt.Swapanall Vijaya Mohite, wife of Vijay Dinakr Mohite, aged about . i 34 years. Permanent resident of Holiche Tek, 32 Shirala, Sangli, Maharasthra and presently residing near to the house of the 1 Petitioner in Nellore City, SPSR,Nellore District St ...PETITIONERS L/ AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, trep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, AP. 2. The Director General of Police, State of Andhra Pradesh, Office at Mangadagiri, Guntur District, AP. 3. The Superintendent of Police, SPSR Nellore District, Nellore City, AP. . The Station House Officer, Santhapet Police, Nellore City, SPSR Nellore District, AF\^ 5. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Santha'lSet Police, Nellore City, SPSR Nellore District, AP. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue, a Wirt, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Wirt of Habeas Corpus declaring the action of the 4*'' and 5^^ respondents herein for their illegal detention of the Petitioners husbands namely (1) Sagar Rankhambe and (2) Vijaya Dinakar Mohite from the custody of the 4th and 5th respondents herein taken on 14.30 hours on 17.05.2025 by demanding of 500 grams of gold without registering a crime or following the law is arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and infringement of personal rights (Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India) of the petitioners husbands and consequently direct further direct the 2"^^ and 3'’'^ Respondents herein to cause prBduction of the petitioners husbands precisely of (1) Sagar Rankhambd & (2) Vijaya Dinakar Mohite respectively before this Honble Court on 22.05^^025 and to direct the 3^'^ respondent herein to produce the CCTV fOotage from 14.30 hours of 17.05.2025 till 20.05.^25 of the Santhapet Police Station before this Honble Court for appreciation and further direct the 2""^ respondent herein to take action against the 4**" and 5‘^ respondents herein for sheer violation of the law of the land, vy" ; > lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased further, direct the 2’^^ and 3'^'^ respondents herein to produce the petitioners husbands namely Sagar RankhaiTibe & Vijaya Dinakar^ohite before this Hon’ble Court on 22.05.2025 (before the vacation bench) pending disposal of the above said writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI V.SURENDRA REDDY v/ Counsel for the Respondents: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following: ORDER / APHC010275812025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3534] THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 13793 OF 2025 Between: Nayan Rankhambe and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.VSURENDRA REDDY ...RESPONDENT(S) X Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following: ORDER:- {Per Hon’ble Sri Justice K. Suresh Reddy) Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Special Government Pleader attached to the office of the learned Advocate General, on instructions, states that the husbands of the petitioners by name Sagar Rankhambe and Vijaya Dinakar Mohite were called to the Police Station by Respondent No.4 in connection with Crime No. 104 of 2025 of Santapet Police Station, Nellore Town, which was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for the purpose of enquiry. Subsequently, Respondent No.4 let out both of them. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners also states that both of them were returned home. 3. In view of the said statements made by both the learned counsel, the present Writ Petition is closed, granting liberty to the husbands of petitioners to avail appropriate remedies available under law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- M. PRABHAKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR y 4r SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, ■i- 1. One CC to Sri V.Surendra Redciy Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri The'Advocate General Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CD Copies MBT HIGH COURT DATED:22/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.13793 of 2025 I* 2« MAY 2025 -v?/ . Current beciion .y CLOSING OF THE WRIT PETITTION WITHOUT COSTS