Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 196950 (ALL)

BALWAN SINGH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/13506/2025 · 2025-11-21

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13506 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly following relief:- "I. Issue a writ, direction or order in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties particularly the opposite party No.2 to make permanent/ confirm the services of the petitioner on the post of Chainman w.e.f. 12.12.2006 like other similarly situated persons or w.e.f. 28.2.2002, when the services of the petitioner were regularized on the said post after calling all files and records relating to the petitioner from Anubhag-10, Land Acquisition Department to Anubhag-6, Nazarat Department." 3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. Chairman, Board of Revenue, U.P., Anubhag - 6, Nazarat Department, Lucknow, - or any other competent authority who shall consider and decide the same within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order. 4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. November 21, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramesh Singh, Himanshu Deepak Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Balwan Singh Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench