VINOD NARSINGH MARSHETTI v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
BA/1073/2025 · 2025-10-13
Shri Sanjay A Deshmukh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19695 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19695 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
12 BA NO. 1073 OF 2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 12 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1073 OF 2025 Vinod Narsingh Marshetti VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra ... Mr. Shejwal Arun S., Advocate for Applicant Mr. R. S. Wani, APP for Respondent/State CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 13.10.2025 PER COURT :-
1. Heard learned advocate for the applicant and learned APP for the State.
2. When this Court expressed disinclination to allow the application, upon instructions, learned advocate for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the application.
3. Leave granted. The application is disposed of as withdrawn.
4. The Trial Court is directed to decide the case as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of one year from today. However, it is clarified that if any matter is earlier expedited either by the Honourable Supreme Court or this Court, then the Trial Court shall conclude that case first and then proceed further with this trial. Needless to mention that it is a sessions trial and word “sessions” means once it is started it shall not be stopped until it is concluded.
[ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] HRJadhav 1 of 1