SHAMEEM AHMAD W.P. 4797 S/S 2012 v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. HOME DPETT. and ORS.
SPLA/653/2012 · 2025-12-19
Rajan Roy, Rajeev Bharti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196943 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196943 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 653 of 2012 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None appears on behalf of the appellant. Learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents is present.
3. The appeal is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. December 19, 2025 Anand/- Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : S.N. Bhardwaj Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Shameem Ahmad W.P. 4797 S/S 2012 .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Dpett. And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench