ASHISH SAROJ v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY./ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.
BAIL/11998/2024 · 2025-11-21
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196932 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196932 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11998 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.191 of 2023, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 352, 308, 307 IPC, Police Station Maheshganj, District Pratapgarh.
3. The FIR in question was lodged alleging that the accused named in the FIR was attacked to the family members of the informant, who were raising constructions.
4. The Counsel for the applicant argues that a cross FIR was also lodged at the instance of the applicant which indicates the presence of injury on both sides.
5. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
6. Considering the fact that the dispute arose on account of raising constructions and there being nothing to indicate the premeditated intent coupled with the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 02.07.2024, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed . Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashutosh Pratap Singh, Amrit Kumar Tiwari, Kirti Veer Singh, Ravi Shanker Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ashish Saroj .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy./Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
7. Let the applicant Ashish Saroj be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 21, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 11998 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench