KADIR ALI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
NABAIL/179/2024 · 2025-11-15
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196926 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196926 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 179 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The present application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.251 of 2024, under Sections 376, 201, 34 of IPC, Police Station Khargupur, District Gonda.
3. It is argued that the benefit of ad-interim anticipatory bail was granted on 28.11.2024 and now the charge-sheet has been filed on 22.02.2025.
4. In the counter affidavit also, there is no material to suggest that the applicant has misused the benefit of ad-interim anticipatory bail. It is stated that the cognizance has also been taken also.
4. Considering the reasoning recorded in the order dated 28.11.2024, the benefit of ad-interim anticipatory bail is extended on the same terms and conditions as contained in the said order till the conclusion of the trial subject to the applicant Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashish Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Archana Rawat Kadir Ali .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
furnishing fresh sureties to the satisfaction of the trial court concerned.
5. The present application for anticipatory bail is accordingly disposed off. November 15, 2025 Raj NABAIL No. 179 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench