Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 196919 (ALL)

HEMCHANDRA KAPOOR @ HEM AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/8329/2025 · 2025-10-06

Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary, Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8329 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Anand Pratap Singh, Advocate who has filed vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party no. 3. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioners have assailed the impugned FIR bearing FIR/Case Crime No.0599 of 2025, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station- Kotwali Nagar, District- Gonda. 3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners have informed that during the pendency of this writ petition petitioner no. 2 has been arrested. He also submitted that petitioner no. 1 may be given liberty to file anticipatory bail application before the competent court of law and direction may be issued to decide the same with expedition. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite parties has informed that the role of the petitioner no.1 and petitioner no. 2 is the same, therefore, this writ petition is not maintainable, inasmuch as the co-accused having similar role has been arrested. 5. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue and considering the aforesaid request of learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioner no. 1 is permitted to file anticipatory bail application before the competent court of law and if such anticipatory bail application is filed, the same Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Pradeep Kumar Shukla Hemchandra Kapoor @ Hem And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) may be heard and disposed of on its own merit. 6 . The writ petition is disposed of. October 6 , 2025 Anuj Singh CRLP No. 8329 of 2025 2 (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench